Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Learning Perl as a First (programming) language

by talexb (Canon)
on Aug 02, 2002 at 13:54 UTC ( #187088=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Learning Perl as a First (programming) language
in thread Learning Perl as a First (programming) language

Since you asked, here's the equivalent in C (for those that aren't familiar -- I'm sure you are):

#include <stdio.h> int main(void) { int i; for ( i = 0; i < 10; i++ ) { printf ( "%d", i ); } }
The equivalent in Perl is
for ( $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++ ) { print $i; }
No variable declarations, a friendlier print statement, and no mysterious 'cargo-cult' include thingy.

Don't get me wrong -- I have programmed in C since the early 80's and I love the language. But Perl takes care of lots of the underlying stuff (how many times did I write fopen(), fread() and fclose() statements I wonder). That's why I think Perl is a better choice than C.

Perl can be a heavyweight language, but it can also be lightweight. To use the car analogy, C is a bit like the British Triumph, a little finicky, but piles of power and cornering. Pascal is a bit like a Pinto or a CV5 stuck in second gear. Perl is like a Porsche or a Lexus, nimble yet powerful.

--t. alex

"Mud, mud, glorious mud. Nothing quite like it for cooling the blood!"
--Michael Flanders and Donald Swann


Comment on Re: Re: Learning Perl as a First (programming) language
Select or Download Code
Re: Learning Perl as a First (programming) language
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Aug 02, 2002 at 14:10 UTC
    Well, you are forgetting a my $i if you want to have equivalent code. I maintain the code is nearly identical - there's a few lines more in C, which look a lot for such a short program, but it wasn't linear in the size of the Perl program. Had you have had 100 of such loops, you'd have had the same amount of extra lines.

    I never claimed that C would have been a better choice than Perl. Instead, I said that I didn't consider C a good first language either. IMO there's only one reason to learn C before learning Perl and that's because there's so much of C in Perl. It makes you a better Perl programmer.

    Abigail

        Well, you are forgetting a my $i if you want to have equivalent code.
      No, :) I purposefully left it out, in order to demonstrate the point that Perl will autovivify a variable for you, while C will just throw an error. I also purposefully did not use strict or include the she-bang line.

      --t. alex

      "Mud, mud, glorious mud. Nothing quite like it for cooling the blood!"
      --Michael Flanders and Donald Swann

Re: Re: Re: Learning Perl as a First (programming) language
by sauoq (Abbot) on Aug 02, 2002 at 19:31 UTC
    Perl is like a Porsche or a Lexus, nimble yet powerful.

    I rather think Perl is more like a little Z3 that'll turn into a cement mixer, eigtheen wheeler, station wagon (complete with wood panel sides), tow truck, fire engine, or lear jet with the push of a button.

    Ok. . . with the push of many buttons in exactly the right order. . . or close to the right order anyway.

    -sauoq
    "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
    

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://187088]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-11 20:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (235 votes), past polls