|Just another Perl shrine|
Managing your IP space with Perlby fokat (Deacon)
|on Aug 15, 2002 at 19:02 UTC||Need Help??|
What this tutorial is all about...
Some of us, monks who love Perl, also have to deal with the complexities of IP addresses, subnets and such. A while ago, I wrote NetAddr::IP to help me work out tedious tasks such as finding out which addresses fell within a certain subnet or allocating IP space to network devices.
This tutorial discusses many common tasks along with solutions using NetAddr::IP. Since Perl lacks a native type to represent either an IP address or an IP subnet, I feel this module has been quite helpful for fellow monks who like me, need to work in this area.
Note however that neither the module itself nor this tutorials are intended as replacements to your knowledge about how to work with chunks of IP space. The module was written as a tool to help with the boring tasks (after all, we're plentiful with good laziness, aren't we?) and this tutorial, was written to help answer the most common questions I get. Both the module and this tutorial expect you to be fluent in basic networking and somewhat fluent in Perl. You should not writing Perl code to manage your subnetting otherwise.
Specifying an IP Address or a subnet
A NetAddr::IP object represents a subnet. This involves storing an IP address within the subnet along with the subnet's netmask. Of course, using a host netmask (/32 or in decimal notation, 255.255.255.255) allows for the specification of a single IP address.
You can create a NetAddr::IP object with an incantation like the following:
which will create an object representing the 'address' 127.0.0.1 or the 'subnet' 127.0.0.1/32.
Creating a subnet is equally easy. Just specify the address and netmask in almost any common notation, as in the following examples:
The following is a list of the acceptable arguments to ->new() and their meanings:
The semantics and notations depicted above, are supposed to comply strictly with the DWIM approach which is so popular with Perl. The general idea is that you should be able to stick almost anything resembling an IP address or a subnet specification into the ->new() method to get an equivalent object. However, if you can find another notation that is not included in the above list, please by all means let me know.
Simple operations with subnets
There is a number of operations that have been simplified along the different versions of the module. The current version, as of this writing, provides support for the following operations:
Common (and not so common) tasks
This is one of the reason for writing NetAddr::IP in the first place. Let's say you have a few chunks of IP space and you want to find the optimum CIDR representation for them. By optimum, I mean the least amount of CIDR subnets that exactly represent the given IP address space. The code below is an example of this:
Which will, of course, output 10.0.0.0/17, 10.0.160.0/19, 10.0.192.0/18. Let's see how this is done...
First, the line starting with push ... creates a list of objects representing all the subnets read in via the <DATA> filehandle. There should be no surprises here.
Then, we call NetAddr::IP::compact with the list of subnets build earlier. This function accepts a list of subnets as its input (actually, an array of objects). It processes them internally and outputs another array of objects, as summarized as possible.
Using compact() as in the example is fine when you're dealing with a few subnets or are writing a throw-away one-liner. If you think your script will be handling more than a few tens of subnets, you might find compactref() useful. It works exactly as shown before, but takes (and returns) references to arrays. I've seen 10x speed improvements when working with huge lists of subnets.
Something that gets asked quite frequently is "why not @EXPORT or at least, @EXPORT_OK methods such as compact()?". The answer is that I believe compact() to be a very generic name, for an operation that is not always used. I think fully qualifying it, adds to the mnemonics of what's being done while not polluting the namespace innecesarilly.
Assigning address space
This problem can be tought as the complement to the prior one. Let's say a couple of network segments need to be connected to your network. You can carve slices out of your address space easily, such as in the following code:
Which will divide your precious address space (the one specified in the NetAddr::IP->new()) in subnets with a netmask of 24 bytes. This magic is accomplished by the ->split() method, which takes the number of bits in the mask as its only parameter. It returns a list of subnets contained in the original object.
Again, in situations where the split might return a large number of subnets, you might prefer the use of ->splitref(), which returns a reference to an array instead.
Returning to our example, you might assign a /24 to each new subnet. Ok, perhaps assigning a /24 is not that good an example, as this falls on an octet boundary but trust me, when you have to split a /16 in /20s, to be allocated in chunks of /22s in a network spanning the whole country, it's nice to know your subnetting is well done.
Cisco's wildcard notation (and other dialects)
Those of you who have had to write an ACL in a Cisco router, know about the joys of this peculiar format in which the netmask works the opposite of what custom says.
An easy way to convert between traditional notation and Cisco's wildcard notation, is to use the eloquently named ->wildcard() method, as this example shows:
As you might have guessed, ->wildcard() returns an array whose first element is the address and its second element is the netmask, in wildcard notation. If scalar context is forced using scalar, only the netmask will be returned, as this is most likely what you want.
In case you wonder, the example outputs 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.127.
Just for the record, below is a number of outputs from different methods for the above example:
Matching against your address space
Let's say you have a log full of IP addresses and you want to know which ones belong to your IP space. A simple way to achieve this is shown below:
This code will output only the addresses belonging to your address space, represented by $space. The only interesting thing here is the use of the ->contains() method. As used in our example, it returns a true value if $ip is completely contained within the $space subnet.
Alternatively, the condition could have been written as $ip->within($space). Remember that TIMTOWTDI.
Walking through the network without leaving the office
Some of the nicest features of NetAddr::IP can be better put to use when you want to perform actions with your address space. Some of them are discussed below.
One of the most efficient ways to walk your address space is building a for loop, as this example shows:
The nicest thing about this way of walking your IP space, is that even if you are lucky enough to have lots of it, you won't eat all your memory by generating a huge list of objects. In this example, only one object is created in every iteration of the loop.
Everything up to the inner loop should be pretty clear by now, so we just ignore it. Since a couple of new friends were introduced in the inner loop of our example, an explanation is in order.
This C-like for loop uses the ->first() function to find the first subnet address. The first subnet address is defined as that having all of its host bits but the rightmost set to zero and the rightmost, set to one.
We then use the numerical comparison discussed earlier to see if the value of $ip is less than or equal to whatever ->last() returns. ->last() returns an address with all of its host bits set to one but the rightmost. If this condition holds, we execute the loop and post-increment $ip to get the next IP address in the subnet.
I started the discussion on this topic with the approach that insures less wasted resources. However, in the purest Perl tradition, this is not the only way to do it. There's another way, reserved for the true lazy (or those with memory to burn, but we all know you never have enough memory, right?).
This other way is invoked with the ->hostenum() or the ->hostenumref() methods. They return either an array or a reference to an array respectively, containing one object for each host address in the subnet. Note that only valid host addresses will be returned (as objects) since the network and broadcast addresses are seldom useful.
With no further preamble, I introduce an example that kids shouldn't attempt at home, or at least in production code. (If you find this warning superfluous, try adding 220.127.116.11/8 to the __DATA__ section and see if your machine chews through it all).
If you really have enough memory, you'll see that each host address in your IP space is generated into a huge array. This is much more costly (read, slow) than the approach presented earlier, but provides for more compact one-liners or quickies.
Finding out how big is your network
Have you wondered just how many IP addresses can you use in your current subnet plan? If the answer to this (or to a similar question) is yes, then read on.
There is a method called ->num() that will tell you exactly how many addresses can you use in a given subnet. For the quick observers out there, you can also use something like scalar $subnet->hostenum but this is a really expensive way of doing it.
A more conservative (in resources) approach is depicted below:
Sometimes, you will be surprised at how many addresses are lost by subnetting, but we'll leave that discussion to other tutorials.