Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: RE: RE: Get those parameters without CGI.pm

by j.a.p.h. (Pilgrim)
on Jun 22, 2000 at 04:02 UTC ( #19376=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE: RE: Get those parameters without CGI.pm
in thread Get those parameters without CGI.pm

And what if I need to do something similar, but can't use CGI.pm to do it? There's obviously some way it could be better. But apparently, no one knows how. Thanks for the help.
  • Comment on RE: RE: RE: RE: Get those parameters without CGI.pm

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re(5): Get those parameters without CGI.pm
by coolmichael (Deacon) on Jun 13, 2002 at 18:14 UTC
    Sorry. That just doesn't make sense. CGI.pm is included in all recent (from 5.0 onwards, I believe) perl distributions. Even if it isn't included (at which point you should fire your sysadmin) you can still use it.

    You should take a look here. You can always use CGI.pm.

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Get those parameters without CGI.pm
by KM (Priest) on Jun 22, 2000 at 04:06 UTC
    Don't give a 'what if'. Tell us what you need to do that is similar. You need to parse QUERY_STRING in a 'similar' way? Maybe you want to URI decode the string, CGI.pm does that (and other modules, too). Use CPAN, grasshopper.

    Cheers,
    KM

      I don't currently need to do something similar. I'm working on my skills for when I will need to. And it might not be CGI, so using CGI.pm wouldn't be all that useful.
        Um.. then why are you getting parameters from a CGI? Seems like CGI.pm would be useful.

        Cheers,
        KM

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://19376]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (4)
As of 2016-12-10 23:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    On a regular basis, I'm most likely to spy upon:













    Results (166 votes). Check out past polls.