laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Inline::Brainfuckby jaldhar (Vicar) |
on Aug 29, 2002 at 14:59 UTC ( [id://193794]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I hear what you're saying. That's why I made the extra instructions entirely optional and only switched on by a special pragma. # I've seen in other implementations. At least one web page says it is a "common" extension. As I wanted to try out implementing pragmas, it seemed like a good one. ~ I agree is just sugar. It was implemented for the same reasons as above. But like I said, its' all optional. Btw I'm also thinking about adding ` as an optional comment character (i.e ignore everything from there up to the end of the line.) How's that for blasphemy? :-) No support for nested loops. This is a big one. As far as I can see there is no support for nested loops in your implementation (or am I wrong?). Tell me more. How would you want that to work? Some sort of stack? Labels? --
In Section
Cool Uses for Perl
|
|