Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Frank
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Are prototypes evil?

by lestrrat (Deacon)
on Sep 03, 2002 at 10:05 UTC ( #194715=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Are prototypes evil?

I think when they are called for ( such as when you described "... I like the ability to use subs like built-ins.." ), they can be good. The reason most people that I know detest them is because it gives you false sense of security

For example, you may think that a sub foo($) would force perl to raise an error if you passed an array to it. But this produces no errors:

my @list = qw/ foo bar baz /; foo( @list );

instead, you get size of the list.

I find this to be extremely dangerous, because a lot of people expect "prototypes" to work sort of like C/C++/Java prototypes, and what's worse, it sometimes seems to work that way as well (For example, foo($a,$b) would in fact generate an error)

That's exactly why I don't like them, and almost never use them except for in esoteric cases. At the very least, I think the use should NOT be encouraged.


Comment on Re: Are prototypes evil?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://194715]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-04-19 05:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (478 votes), past polls