Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Are prototypes evil?

by sauoq (Abbot)
on Sep 03, 2002 at 21:22 UTC ( #194902=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Are prototypes evil?
in thread Are prototypes evil?

they do at least provide a convenient way to document the types and order of values to be passed, which at least would seem to me to help when someone is looking at a module written using them.

Please no, No, NO, NO, NO! Say it ain't so! Comments are a convenient way to document the types and order of subroutine parameters; prototypes most certainly are not. That is arguably true in just about any language. In Perl, it is doubly so because using prototypes in places where they aren't needed creates an enormous maintenance hassle.

I strongly encourage you to read Tom Christiansen's Prototypes in Perl which greenFox also mentioned in his reply above. You might be surprised to see how much trouble "prototypes" can get you into.

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";


Comment on Re: Re: Are prototypes evil?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://194902]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-26 00:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (175 votes), past polls