Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Possible change to node approval/frontpage process

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Sep 13, 2002 at 13:04 UTC ( #197547=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Possible change to node approval/frontpage process

I'd take that a step further and bring the front-paging into line with the consideration process and have it require at least two votes and maybe the full five before it went through.

A few times I've though a node should be FP'd but not done so because I also wished to respond to it. If it to more than my vote, then I wouldn't face the dilemma of only doing one or the other.

I've also seen some stuff out there that I wouldn't have voted for FPing. If it took more than one person's opinion, that would be less likely to happen.


Well It's better than the Abottoire, but Yorkshire!


Comment on Re: Possible change to node approval/frontpage process

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://197547]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (18)
As of 2014-08-27 14:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (239 votes), past polls