Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical

Re: Possible change to node approval/frontpage process

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Sep 13, 2002 at 13:04 UTC ( #197547=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Possible change to node approval/frontpage process

I'd take that a step further and bring the front-paging into line with the consideration process and have it require at least two votes and maybe the full five before it went through.

A few times I've though a node should be FP'd but not done so because I also wished to respond to it. If it to more than my vote, then I wouldn't face the dilemma of only doing one or the other.

I've also seen some stuff out there that I wouldn't have voted for FPing. If it took more than one person's opinion, that would be less likely to happen.

Well It's better than the Abottoire, but Yorkshire!

Comment on Re: Possible change to node approval/frontpage process

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://197547]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-11-29 16:09 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (751 votes), past polls