Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re: Re: OT: Preserving Information

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Oct 09, 2002 at 16:44 UTC ( #203989=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: OT: Preserving Information
in thread OT: Preserving Information

Look, if you copy something from the net and make it available to others, you are very likely to get away with it. And even if you get sued, you might not have to pay damages even if you lose. But that doesn't make it legal, let alone ethical.

I completely agree with all of that and it sort makes my point about the absurdity of the law, though I realise that is arguable too.

What's so hard respecting the wishes of the author, and be conservative if you don't know the wishes?

This is where things get a little fuzzy for me. In the case of the original post it was stated that the information was still available, but had simply fallen into neglect and the Original Poster was concerned that the information might cease to be available by virtue of that neglect rather than having be deliberately withdrawn. I'm not sure if this makes a difference. If the originator of the information had (for example) died, doesn't the copyright die with him?

I certainly would like for people to respect my wishes and to not republish something I have withdrawn.

I completely agree with this. Information deliberately withdrawn by the author should be allowed to die a natural death. It's this very point that I have against the "do not change history" viewpoint that is prevelent hereabouts.

Cor! Like yer ring! ... HALO dammit! ... 'Ave it yer way! Hal-lo, Mister la-de-da. ... Like yer ring!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: OT: Preserving Information
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Oct 10, 2002 at 06:45 UTC
    Work is copyrighted at least 50 years after the author dies. But it might be longer in some countries.

    Also, what is "neglect"? Just because something isn't available anymore under a certain URL doesn't mean it disappeared. It might well be that one considers "neglect" just means the author moved it elsewhere.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://203989]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-05-25 17:14 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?