Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Following up: Re: LWP oddity

by adamsj (Hermit)
on Nov 13, 2002 at 18:12 UTC ( #212656=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: LWP oddity
in thread LWP oddity

I hadn't thought to set LWP::Debug (and did you know that Perl and LWP doesn't deal with LWP::Debug at all?), but now I have, and am getting much the same result when the proxy statement is removed. Without proxy, the output from LWP::Debug is:

LWP::UserAgent::request: () LWP::UserAgent::send_request: GET ftp://user:password@10.10.10.10/outg +oing/ LWP::UserAgent::_need_proxy: Not proxied LWP::UserAgent::send_request: ftp URLs are among LWP::UserAgent=HASH(0 +x83ae480)'s allowed protocols (ftp http) LWP::MediaTypes::read_media_types: Reading media types from /my/lib/pe +rl5/site_perl/5.6.1/LWP/media.types LWP::Protocol::ftp::request: () LWP::Protocol::MyFTP::new: ()
and here the debugger dies, along with the script.

With the proxy statement left in, I get:

LWP::UserAgent::request: () LWP::UserAgent::send_request: GET ftp://user:password@10.10.10.10/outg +oing/ LWP::UserAgent::_need_proxy: Proxied to http://www.nunya.biz:8080 LWP::UserAgent::send_request: http URLs are among LWP::UserAgent=HASH( +0x83d28b0)'s allowed protocols (ftp http) LWP::Protocol::http::request: () LWP::Protocol::collect: read 315 bytes LWP::Protocol::collect: read 4096 bytes LWP::Protocol::collect: read 4096 bytes LWP::Protocol::collect: read 2954 bytes LWP::Protocol::collect: read 1460 bytes LWP::Protocol::collect: read 660 bytes LWP::Protocol::collect: read 32 bytes LWP::UserAgent::request: Simple response: OK
and the debugger stays alive and ready to proceed.

On the off-chance this was an artifact of the debugger, I ran without the -d flag and sprinkled in some print statements. This didn't produce any change--LWP::Debug gave the same output and I died in the same place.

So at this point, I'm slightly stumped. I suppose my next move is either to give up and say "What the heck do I care? It works, doesn't it?" or step laboriously through the LWP code itself to see where it dies.

I'm certainly open to a better idea than either of those two.

Afterthought: I'm running 5.6.1. LWP is version 5.63.

adamsj

They laughed at Joan of Arc, but she went right ahead and built it. --Gracie Allen


Comment on Following up: Re: LWP oddity
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://212656]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-07 11:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (88 votes), past polls