Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (my?) problem with re-blessed references(?)

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Dec 13, 2002 at 11:40 UTC ( #219559=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (my?) problem with re-blessed references(?)
in thread (my?) problem with re-blessed references(?)

Thanks adrianh++.

I should've spotted the shift thing myself. It was 4:00 am though. (Excuses, excuses &^) ... that's a crossed-eyed smiley).

The $self = bless \$self, $class; bit was just an idea that I never got around to looking at the effects of as the other stuff was going wrong. The strange thing is that using that rather than [], meant that somethings appeared to be working, ie. the hashes in the base class were being populated, though 2 of the 3 hashes were getting two entries. 1 under the subclass reference and one under the base class reference? The 3rd hash (%approved) was only getting a single entry.

I know that all sounds implausible given they are all initialised in the same way, but that is what I was seeing.

I've made a backup of that version and will get back to investingating what was going on once I've finished experimenting with this.


Examine what is said, not who speaks.


Comment on Re: Re: (my?) problem with re-blessed references(?)
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://219559]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (19)
As of 2015-07-01 20:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (19 votes), past polls