Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Capitalized subroutine names and packages

by coolmichael (Deacon)
on Jan 05, 2003 at 23:50 UTC ( #224491=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Capitalized subroutine names and packages

This really surprised me. I figured that main::Bar would be called and return "Foo". But then I thought that "Foo"->new() would be using "Foo" as a string reference, which isn't generally allowed with strict.

Obviously, there is something deeper here that I do not understand. Could someone please explain why use strict; doesn't complain?


Comment on Re: Capitalized subroutine names and packages
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Capitalized subroutine names and packages
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 06, 2003 at 00:24 UTC
    When you write Bar->new, the "Bar" is already a string. The package is resolved at runtime via the symbol table. It has to, if you think about it.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://224491]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-11-29 11:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (750 votes), past polls