Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

by Elian (Parson)
on Jan 06, 2003 at 22:06 UTC ( #224762=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
in thread Deep Linkage

Oh, I dunno... seems awfully excessive to me.


Comment on Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 06, 2003 at 22:23 UTC

    Not at all, in fact during the pre-XP/Post ratio era there were many threads that extended beyond this. Around the turn of the 14th century this all changed and threads began to take on a longer single post format as opposed to the multiple terser post format of the previous era.

    I believe there is even a group that reenacts these old time discussions, though I can't find the link right now ;).

      But what is the record number of 'RE:'s for a post with some actual content?
        You are reading it now (for certain definitions of the word content).

        (I'm not really here anyway)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://224762]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-10-26 01:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (149 votes), past polls