Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

But what is the record number of 'RE:'s for a post with some actual content?

Comment on Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage by turnstep (Parson) on Jan 23, 2003 at 02:40 UTC
You are reading it now (for certain definitions of the word content). (I'm not really here anyway)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage by jdporter (Paladin) on Aug 04, 2006 at 15:58 UTC
True...	[reply]
Re^20: Deep Linkage by Happy-the-monk (Canon) on Sep 02, 2013 at 13:49 UTC
True... ...but silly. Cheers, Sören Créateur des bugs mobiles - let loose once, run everywhere. (hooked on the Perl Programming language)	[reply]