Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number

Re: XS or SWIG

by MZSanford (Curate)
on Feb 03, 2003 at 16:35 UTC ( #232291=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to XS or SWIG

Personally ...

I find that XS makes faster code, since it does not insert another layer of abstraction like SWIG. I think that XS is the best long term solution, since it is the interface provided with perl, and creates very tightly integrated code (letting you handle argument stacks and such as needed). But, i have to admit, porting large libraries can be tedious (but worth it in my opinion)

When i have used SWIG, i have found that quite often it creates code with minor problems that have to be fixed to get it to compile. Since SWIG creates an entire abstraction layer, this C-diving is not simple. But, if the code it creates works, it is ver fast to impliment.

For me, SWIG is quicker to create code, but XS creates better code. Your milage may vary.

from the frivolous to the serious

Comment on Re: XS or SWIG

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://232291]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (16)
As of 2015-11-30 20:44 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (782 votes), past polls