Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

by BBQ (Deacon)
on Jul 22, 2000 at 01:12 UTC ( #23838=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
in thread Deep Linkage

...or are you saying that I do such?

Okay, I updated the previous post for clarity. I knew it sounded like bable. Maybe its more comprehensible now. But yes, I was refering to two specific nodes you removed once they started going down: RE: RE: Re: Constant Functions and Re: Setting Retrieve Method

Maybe removing the pic is a bit different, but nevertheless it leaves the impression that you make things "disapear" quite often when the begin to displease you. I may be wrong, but that is not what it seems.

This kind of authoritarian language...

Care to illustrate?

# Trust no1!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
by Aighearach on Jul 22, 2000 at 01:19 UTC
    I find it disturbing that you are following bme arround, keeping tabs on my nodes. I will change the content of my nodes as I see fit, it is not for you to determine, and as such, you should not suggest that you have a right to so determine.

    And considering your personal insults in the root node of this thread, I think you should take some initiative, and ask that your bad, mean, node, be deleted.

    So far, you are just adding attack after attack! It wouldn't all be so bad, except that you were also harrassing me in the chatterbox, claiming to know if I voted on a node, even! You are a stalker, go stalk somebody else.

    Paris Sinclair    |    4a75737420416e6f74686572    |    205065726c204861636b6572
      1. Dude, I'm REALLY sorry that you think I would actually spend time stalking you. I'm having loads of fun, in case you haven't noticed by now. The way I got to those two nodes is because I was curious about your worst nodes. I'm sure you don't oppose to that do you???

        If it makes you feel any better / safer, I'll only read your posts if you ask me to.

      2. About my insults, I have already asked for your forgiveness, but it seems you wish to ignore me instead. I dunno. Doesn't sound right. I would come back with "appologies accepted" or something of the sort.

      3. I'm being bad? Sorry dude, I'm just having fun... And btw: I wasn't harrassing you in the chatterbox, unless you consider, "Why did you vote (insert node) down?" harrasment. I wasn't pretending to know that you voted me down, I was SURE you voted me down. And no, I don't have super-h4x0r-powers, I use logic.
      Dude, chill out... You're getting way too wound up about this. (I'm just nicely recommending btw, I don't want you to think that I am ordering you to chill, or being nasty about this either!!!)

      # Trust no1!
        Until you have had the offending node removed, you certainly do NOT have my forgiveness.

        Once you are no longing making your attacks, then I can accept the appology. But is a bit much to claim that you should be able to determine if and when I accept your appology, and that I should do so regardless of the continuing attacks.

        Paris Sinclair    |    4a75737420416e6f74686572    |    205065726c204861636b6572

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://23838]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-11-25 08:04 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:

    Results (355 votes). Check out past polls.