Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: pmdev: patches to consider (feature idea)

by JayBonci (Curate)
on Mar 12, 2003 at 16:33 UTC ( #242416=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: pmdev: patches to consider (feature idea)
in thread pmdev: patches to consider (feature idea)

Honestly, another feature I'd like is the ability to release a patch's creation to be editable by pmdev. To seriously be able to collaborate on patches, it makes sense that we should be able to make "friendly" amendments to patches, without the actual patch nodes themselves stack up. This'd work well if we had patchcomments to back it up. It'd also help refine things into the best piece of code that the community could come up with. The semantics and social coordination aspect will form naturally from this collaboration.

    --jaybonci


Comment on Re: Re: Re: pmdev: patches to consider (feature idea)
Re^4: pmdev: patches to consider (group edit)
by tye (Cardinal) on Mar 12, 2003 at 17:33 UTC

    gods can set the patch owner to pmdev and then we can all edit together. See parselinksinchatter - (patch), for example (what I used to test before opening my mouth).

    A feature to allow a patch owner to set the owner to be pmdev would be fine if someone wants to patch it in.

                    - tye

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://242416]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-12-23 04:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (135 votes), past polls