Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Unit Testing CGI Programs

by dws (Chancellor)
on Mar 15, 2003 at 00:15 UTC ( #243216=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Unit Testing CGI Programs

Does that sound like Doing The Right Thing, or is there some nifty trick out there that I'm missing?

The pieces you have can be unit tested individually if you break them out. Philosophically, you're doing three things:

  • getting a key from a form (trivial to test in isolation)
  • issuing a query based on that key (easy to test in isolation)
  • expanding the value(s) returned from the query into a template (easy to test in isolation)
You've made a start on teasing these apart into separately testable routines. One possible next step is to isolate the logic that constructs the template. With the logic broken into separate routines, you've in a much better position to selectively replace substructure for testing purposes. (E.g., pull data back from in in-memory stub or repository, rather than querying the database).

On the "trick" side, here's one I've gotten mileage out of: Instead of hard-coding the template name, soft code it in a way that your test harness can change it to use a debugging template. The debugging template strips out everything unnecessary, leaving you with a result (and expanded template) that's easy to verify programmatically.


Comment on Re: Unit Testing CGI Programs

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://243216]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (20)
As of 2014-07-22 14:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (116 votes), past polls