Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: is XML too hard?

by diotalevi (Canon)
on Mar 18, 2003 at 11:58 UTC ( #243947=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: is XML too hard?
in thread is XML too hard?

xml-dev s-expression + xml-dev lisp has some good return results. For this example visist http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200112/msg00438.html. Actual lisp programmers would know how to write the text bits as well.

(REALLYLONGNAME [with_a_property="aaa"] " some free form text " (ANOTHERLONGNAME "foo") " text text")


Comment on Re: Re: Re: is XML too hard?
Download Code
Re: Re: Re: Re: is XML too hard?
by zby (Vicar) on Mar 18, 2003 at 13:36 UTC
    OK - I was fooled by the unquoted 'foo' in the first example.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://243947]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-12-28 13:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (181 votes), past polls