Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: is XML too hard?

by miktro (Initiate)
on Mar 18, 2003 at 15:49 UTC ( #244037=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to is XML too hard?

I have been using XML for about 3 years now.

What I have found important to remember is that XML is a way of tagging the INFORMATION content of data / text.
It is not primarily a DATA storage / representation format.

However efficient / poor the XML handling software may be - if the data isn't organised for what you need to do the program will be slow, large or convoluted.

I quite often find that I need to restructure the XML into an organisation that is relevant and suitable for the processing I need to do.
I generally use XSLT for this - which I find robust and clear for this step - and nearly always do some XSLT / SAX pre-processing.

When the data matches the application then using XML + Xpath or SAX is usually a very concise way of achieving the desired result.

There are also cases where I convert the XML file into another format entirely and use a non-XML based approach.

I am probably fortunate as most of the times I need to use XML it is for data which is deeply heriarchical, where context matters and XPath is a very natural way of describing data clusters and relationships.


Comment on Re: is XML too hard?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://244037]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-10-23 06:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (124 votes), past polls