Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation

RE: Make Supersearch more obvious

by lindex (Friar)
on Jul 31, 2000 at 12:49 UTC ( #25227=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Make Supersearch more obvious

I would like to add one more thing, we should beable to vote more than once on a node.
Considering I did not know about Super Search I find this node very helpfull in it self and should get more than one of my votes :)

/****************************/, /*****************************/

Comment on RE: Make Supersearch more obvious
Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Make Supersearch more obvious
by atl (Pilgrim) on Jul 31, 2000 at 14:42 UTC
    On a first glance I'd say yes, it's unfair that I can give a good node and an excellent node only the same vote-up.

    But there might be a problem when it comes to flame threads, and god knows this site has some (I have only the link to this one handy, but there are more). Consider what might be going on if some monks might start a showdown with their votes ...

    No offence meant to anyone!

    It's just that one man one vote is ok, in my own humble opinion.


    P.S.: No objections against kudra's suggestion. I agree.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://25227]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-11-25 09:08 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (672 votes), past polls