|P is for Practical|
Re: Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?by ybiC (Prior)
|on Apr 30, 2003 at 03:14 UTC||Need Help??|
I had developed the opinion that Perl Monks Discussion was for discussing framework facets of PM as a site (voting, experience, markup, etc.). Barring any supporting posts in this thread that are as sensible, well-researched, and eloquent as "Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?", my thinking will doubtless be swayed to agreement with brer tye.As for updating "Where should I post X?", that sounds like a swell idea - go for it!
striving toward Perl Adept
(it's pronounced "why-bick")
Update/Clarification: my original thinking was the opposite of what tye says above. In light of his compelling and clear arguments, I now agree with him that posts primarily about social aspects of the Monastery would generally be best posted to Perl Monks Discussion, along with posts on mechanical facets of this site.
Two benefits come to mind for as-consistant-as-is-reasonably-practical placement of nodes within sections: