Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: The SSSCA considered harmful

by tilly (Archbishop)
on May 05, 2003 at 15:13 UTC ( #255646=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: The SSSCA considered harmful
in thread The SSSCA considered harmful

Neither of us are lawyers, but my amateur knowledge suggests that you are mistaken.

Under US law the author holds copyright on anything that they write unless they don't for contractual reasons - see works for hire. However copyright is a limited form of ownership.

For instance once you have created and sold a copy, you cannot control the further sales of that copy, or say that certain people cannot own that copy. This is why used bookstores can resell books. (Publishers tried to stop that and failed.) This also covers your ex. However if your ex decided to make copies of your personal letters and send them to friends ridiculing you, then you have a copyright claim against your ex.

Similarly I would be shocked and astonished if mere possession of the physical article of a letter from Ernest Hemingway gave you any right to publish it in your book of letters. This runs counter to everything that I have ever heard on the topic, and before you consider doing something like that, please discuss it with a lawyer! (One of the notable early copyright cases involved the inclusions of letters from Alexander Pope without his permission.)

See this guide on copyright, and there is a direct mention of the case of letters in this primer.

As for the SSSCA, it is now renamed the CBDTPA, and makes half-hearted attempts to address the problems above. What they are coming up with is completely technically unworkable, but now the trick is explaining this to non-technical people who are busy and have no understanding of what the implications of their "small spec change" will be. (Gee, where have we seen this before?) At least they also have realized the potential to create a monopoly position from trying to make it work, and have addressed that. (They also no longer get support from Microsoft for the bill - fancy that.)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: The SSSCA considered harmful
by Your Mother (Chancellor) on May 05, 2003 at 17:34 UTC
    Wow. Thanks for the rebuttal. I stand corrected. Now depressed by the implications. :(

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://255646]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (3)
As of 2017-11-19 00:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:













    Results (278 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?