Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)

by chip (Curate)
on May 11, 2003 at 01:14 UTC ( #257182=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)
in thread RFC: CGI::Tables

Absolutely; I often topicalize with for. But I'd also write "ref $_" as "ref" or "ref()" -- concision!

    -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos


Comment on Re^3: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)
Select or Download Code
Re^4: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on May 11, 2003 at 02:19 UTC
    I don't generally like foo() much for routines that operate on $_. In this case I added it because I'd've had to if I'd written
    'HASH' eq ref ? $_ : {}
    as the question mark is then parsed as a pattern delimiter instead of as part of a ternary. I usually write my comparisons that way around. But here neither the parens nor the variable is necessary as the following eq is unambiguous as to its meaning.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://257182]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2015-01-25 20:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My top resolution in 2015 is:

















    Results (183 votes), past polls