Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^3: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)

by chip (Curate)
on May 11, 2003 at 01:14 UTC ( #257182=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)
in thread RFC: CGI::Tables

Absolutely; I often topicalize with for. But I'd also write "ref $_" as "ref" or "ref()" -- concision!

    -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos

Comment on Re^3: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)
Select or Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: CGI::Tables (topicalize with for)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on May 11, 2003 at 02:19 UTC
    I don't generally like foo() much for routines that operate on $_. In this case I added it because I'd've had to if I'd written
    'HASH' eq ref ? $_ : {}
    as the question mark is then parsed as a pattern delimiter instead of as part of a ternary. I usually write my comparisons that way around. But here neither the parens nor the variable is necessary as the following eq is unambiguous as to its meaning.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://257182]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2015-11-26 09:26 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (696 votes), past polls