(I deleted the rest as distracting fluff)
Regarding your "preaching" comment: that's what I'm talking about. You could easily have justified your assertion that my post is OT. Instead, you chose to use inflammatory language. What purpose did that serve? Rather than back up your assertion, you went on the attack, stating that the "OT stuff" was inexcusable. If you want to break it down logically, you have to make a case that my post is OT, then you have to define inexcusable and how that definition applies to my post.
Cheers,
Ovid
New address of my CGI Course.
Silence is Evil (feel free to copy and distribute widely - note copyright text)
| 