|The stupid question is the question not asked|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mandatory indentingby Juerd (Abbot)
|on Jun 19, 2003 at 06:33 UTC||Need Help??|
Dear lame, anonymous poster,
I wish I could downvote your post more than once :)
maybe you should tell him why it fails
Maclir knows why it fails, and with a little bit of common sense, so can you.
It fails because the source filter is adding curlies where curlies should not be.
and the simple workaround?
The workaround is: don't do that. This source filter does not support escaping newlines.
let me guess, you didn't even take the 12 seconds to RTFM.
That is correct. Because I do not care about Python's friendly manual, I didn't read it. The root node of this thread explains why.
Now, let me guess. You didn't read my post. Pay special attention to the P.S. and the places where I explain how the source filter works and that it is a quick hack.
I'm not sure why you continue to languages you know nothing about.
This post was not about Python, it was about mandatory indenting. Yes, I did ask if Python would be flexible enough - that did not imply anything.
I'm not sure why you reply in threads that you have not read.
Perhaps you should stop complaining
I was not complaining and I still am not. I said that I don't like Python because it expects me to follow its indenting logic. That is not a complaint, that is a simple statement. Please, before posting another stupid and irrelevant reply, READ THE THREAD.
Perhaps you should stop complaining and start reading, it's a far superior approach.
Yes, I really do think you should.