Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Closure on Closures (beta)

by adrianh (Chancellor)
on Jun 25, 2003 at 16:36 UTC ( #268910=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Closure on Closures

++ Nice summary.

Minor niggle. If it were me I would put a little bit more emphasis on lexical scoping and a little less emphasis on reference counting. When the value of a lexical variable is garbage collected is independent of whether a Perl closure is created. It's about scope - not memory usage. For example:

our $Global; sub make_closure { my %lexical; $Global = \%lexical; return sub { my $key = shift; @_ ? $lexical{$key} = shift : $lexical{$key}; }; }; { # here we make a closure my $c = make_closure(); # which we can use to set and get keys $c->(foo => 42); print "foo is ", $c->('foo'), "\n"; # at the end of the scope the closure goes away }; # but the referant is still around print "Global foo is ", $Global->{foo}, "\n";

Update: It might also be worth comparing what Perl does to languages without lexical capture like C.


Comment on Re: Closure on Closures (beta)
Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Closure on Closures (beta)
by Anonymous Monk on Feb 28, 2005 at 11:56 UTC
    the examples in this section are some what complicated for a new learner of perl.specially calling subroutines

    Title edit by tye, restore prefix

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://268910]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-28 02:04 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (251 votes), past polls