Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re^3: Secure Perlmonks

by hatter (Pilgrim)
on Jul 18, 2003 at 10:09 UTC ( #275544=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Secure Perlmonks
in thread Secure Perlmonks

It doesn't have to be mandatory, there could be an extra link 'Log in via SSL' and mention on that page that the cert is self-signed and thus may cause browsers to whinge.

the hatter

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://275544]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: if you have a jpeg data: or as wise Corion said IM ca n read directly your handle
[Corion]: Meh. I get the feeling I should post a call-to-action for people to test their modules with the upcoming 5.26 (or 5.25.latest), as it seems that the smoke testers don't really weed out modules that fail without . in @INC
[Corion]: But without instructions on how to easily test things yourself, I don't think such a call to arms is helpful
[Corion]: (this post on nntp.perl.org / p5p makes it seem to me that smoke testers seem to have a blind spot there)
[Corion]: Hmmm. Maybe setting $ENV{PERL5LIB}=" some path without dot"; perl Makefile.PL; make test already is enough to locally test your module...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-03-27 08:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (317 votes). Check out past polls.