Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Design Flaws in DBIx::Connect

by belg4mit (Prior)
on Jul 22, 2003 at 16:31 UTC ( #276801=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Design Flaws in DBIx::Connect

Couldn't you extend the current API? Send a flag to the sub that indicates you wish the behavior to be different, thusly not breaking prexisting uses.

--
I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.


Comment on Re: Design Flaws in DBIx::Connect
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Design Flaws in DBIx::Connect
by Dog and Pony (Priest) on Jul 22, 2003 at 17:11 UTC
    Or if that is a "bad" idea due to variable number of arguments or something like that, why not simply introduce a new call, parallell to the old one, something like connect_with_config or some such. Then old users would be safe, and new users could choose which they need.
    You have moved into a dark place.
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://276801]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-08 05:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (94 votes), past polls