Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re: Creating 'universal' instances of objects?

by Abigail-II (Bishop)
on Aug 04, 2003 at 13:52 UTC ( #280675=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Creating 'universal' instances of objects?

So, why do you use objects in the first place? If you just want to have one instance of each class anyway, why not just use class methods, and class variables?


Comment on Re: Creating 'universal' instances of objects?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Creating 'universal' instances of objects?
by halley (Prior) on Aug 04, 2003 at 16:12 UTC
    Even if current design suggests that the objects will be unique, it is still a good idea to implement such singleton classes with a single managed instance of that class. Class-oriented singleton resources would be more brittle and resistant to refactoring.

    In the future he may choose to divide global.conf into server.conf and a number of foo-module.conf, and in that case, an object-backed singleton class easily graduates as more complex structures are needed.

    [ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://280675]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (1)
As of 2015-11-27 04:33 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (718 votes), past polls