Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Googlish approach to voting/XP?

by fruiture (Curate)
on Aug 06, 2003 at 20:36 UTC ( #281578=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Googlish approach to voting/XP?

#1 a node already gets more votes because it's linked, you needn't enforce that effect. In the end, a node is upvoted when someone thinks it's good. A link has nothing to do with quality, it's a link. It's the decision of the one who follows the link whether he thinks the node is good or not. You see we're walking in circles: You cannot improve the way nodes are being up/down-voted as it is perfectly fair.

#2 Nope, that's against my sense of democracy, sorry. XP does not mean anything and if it does, it doesn't make your vote weigh more.

--
http://fruiture.de


Comment on Re: Googlish approach to voting/XP?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://281578]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-11-27 16:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (186 votes), past polls