Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Replying to All, an option for SOPW

by phydeauxarff (Priest)
on Aug 07, 2003 at 12:20 UTC ( #281856=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Replying to All, an option for SOPW
in thread Replying to All, an option for SOPW

eek...I was actually thinking of the /msg feature to be used judiciously. But I see your point

Currently, I will go ahead and /msg someone if they are helpful in a significant way and I envisioned my suggestion facilitating this...I didn't even think about it potentially /msg bombing those that post frequently with a bunch of "gee thanks so much <insert saint here>".

Gads, if done wrong something like this could even cause some folks to not want to participate and we certainly aren't looking for that result!

Perhaps there is a way to implement this so that the individuals could 'opt in' of receiving thank you's...something like a button in user settings that said "add /msg me to my replies" or some such....sort of like the current " /msg me when there's a reply to one of my posts" feature

I like the idea of encouraging thank you's and other such polite replies as I think that if done right it would encourage more participation in this forum, but I must stress the "done right" part.

BTW, Thanks for pointing out the flaw in my thinking


Comment on Re: Re: Replying to All, an option for SOPW

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://281856]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-05 03:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (60 votes), past polls