Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Automatic Re-ing with numbers

by particle (Vicar)
on Aug 11, 2003 at 13:22 UTC ( #282856=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Automatic Re-ing with numbers
in thread Automatic Re-ing with numbers

I prefer seeing the depth, because that tells me how off on a tangent the node is likely to be.

the node depth is not a consistent measure of subject relevance. occasionally, replies between monks approach conversation level, and the depth increases dramatically. this does not mean they have moved off topic.

for instance, i've seen nits worked out of algorithms presented previously, and not patched in the nodes above. if you're unfamiliar with the subject of the thread, and the authors involved in the discussion, it's difficult to generalize relevancy from node depth alone. so perhaps instead of writing that the depth tells you the relevancy, it would be more accurate to say it is one measure of relevancy. no?

~Particle *accelerates*

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://282856]
help
Chatterbox?
[james28909]: i need to fix this issue with perlmonks. i keep having the issue of someone posting something that casues the page to be very wide.
[james28909]: is there some setting i am missing?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2017-05-24 00:56 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?