Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Re: warn for !/m(e|sg) in CB? (no)

by tye (Sage)
on Aug 20, 2003 at 16:22 UTC ( #285231=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to warn for !/m(e|sg) in CB?

It is already a user option: If you want it, then use a client that does that for you. (I'm glad that the java chat clients allow me to disable this "command validation" feature.)

I don't think the HTML chatterbox will ever do this, even optionally. It is a long tradition and previous times it has been discussed there was much opposition to changing it.

I find it a very PMesque quirk that I appreciate even if newer members don't.

                - tye

Comment on Re: warn for !/m(e|sg) in CB? (no)
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: warn for !/m(e|sg) in CB? (no)
by mpd (Monk) on Aug 20, 2003 at 17:16 UTC
    Oh, come now. At least we're not talking about getting rid of stumbit.
    It would not surprise me if that particular phenomenon received its own NHD entry.
Re: Re: warn for !/m(e|sg) in CB? (no)
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 20, 2003 at 16:33 UTC

    Consensus be damned. tye doesn't like it!

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://285231]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-11-29 01:19 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (746 votes), past polls