Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Pure Perl or the toolkit?

by bronto (Priest)
on Aug 21, 2003 at 07:22 UTC ( #285387=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Pure Perl or the toolkit?
in thread Pure Perl or the toolkit?

Say you implement this. Then you want to copy files which have ACLs (Access Control Lists) attached. Now you have to fix File::Copy again to copy the ACLs too. Tomorrow, what other file metadata will be employed at the filesystem level?

IMHO, it doesn't make sense to worry about tomorrow problems if you don't know what they will be (well, at least with a fair amount of probability). <AFAIK>ACLsare still different from OS to OS, and somewhere they can be considered experimental;</AFAIK> it is a moving target, that one can plan to address only where it is stable enough.

By the way, UNIX file permissions are there from the start, on every flavour of UNIX, and that problem on File::Copy should be addressed...

Ciao!
--bronto


The very nature of Perl to be like natural language--inconsistant and full of dwim and special cases--makes it impossible to know it all without simply memorizing the documentation (which is not complete or totally correct anyway).
--John M. Dlugosz


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Pure Perl or the toolkit?
Select or Download Code
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pure Perl or the toolkit?
by crouchingpenguin (Priest) on Aug 21, 2003 at 14:00 UTC

    ...it doesn't make sense to worry about tomorrow problems if you don't know what they will be...

    See You aren't gonna need it for a bit more on exactly that.


    cp
    ----
    "Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark. Professionals built the Titanic."

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://285387]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-07-29 10:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (214 votes), past polls