Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Frank
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?

by Anonymous Monk
on Oct 13, 2003 at 18:43 UTC ( #298921=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?
in thread Short routines matter more in OO?

If this is but one viewpoint, then it is a viewpoint that I like hearing from. :-)
I still have much thinking to do with regards to this notion. But I do think one of OO's non-explicitly recognized advantages is that of managing coupling. The object is an interface to a set of coupled code, relieving both the object writer and the object user from having to manage that aspect of code complexity themselves.

And, one of OO's disadvantages is not recognizing this explicitly, because we then we could have much more meaningful discussions about such controversies as: Are getter/setter methods evil when used from outside the object? from inside the object? Should objects be divorced from their UI via a controller? encapsulate their UI? or provide proxy UI objects? How do we reconcile full encapsulation with inheritance?


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Short routines matter more in OO?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://298921]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-04-20 09:30 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (485 votes), past polls