Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Using a subroutine as a module

by bobn (Chaplain)
on Nov 03, 2003 at 15:43 UTC ( #304135=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Using a subroutine as a module
in thread Using a subroutine as a module

Sorry, I disagree. Modularization of code is desirable. IMHO, using a dummy object to acheive this is more valid than fully qualifying the calls for the following reasons:

  • Typically, less typing, as filenames tend to be longer han variable names (in my world, at least)

  • greater flexibility - if you decide to relocate something in the filesystem, you change only your 'use' and 'new' statments, not everyplace the calls are made.

  • "future-proofing" - as the user gains sophisitication, he or she can more easily modify the modules, or create new ones that inherit from the existing. Exporting or fully qualifying can defeat that.

  • "future-proofing" - on the day when the user suddenly wants to set instance data for his routines, he or she is ready.

Besides, fully qualified calls just look ugly to me, though I suppose it's safer than trusting multiple modules not to stomp on each other or your own functions. Using object methods are also fully qualified.

--Bob Niederman, http://bob-n.com

All code given here is UNTESTED unless otherwise stated.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Using a subroutine as a module

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://304135]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-06 01:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (68 votes), past polls