Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: No Anonymous Reply Option

by danger (Priest)
on Nov 23, 2003 at 18:45 UTC ( #309333=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to No Anonymous Reply Option

artist, I wonder if you might care to explain what it is about anonymous postings that bothers you so much --- that is, in what way would excluding anonymous replies enhance your perlmonks experience? Are there particular threads where i) one or more anonymous replies are somehow bothersome to you, and ii) you would be less bothered if those replies were associated with a registered monk? What is your perceived gain from having and using such an option?

People seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character. Ralph Waldo Emerson; The Conduct of Life, 1860

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://309333]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: gee a social network with the family.. is this a dread? ;=)
[Corion]: Discipulus: Nah, I'm thinking of posting more short stuff, but not all of it is fit for blogs.perl.org, more something a bit longer than Twitter but shorter than my usual b.p.o module posts
[Corion]: But Google+ is tedious and I'd like to keep my posts on an open platform instead, which can be followed via RSS

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-05-26 07:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?