|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Re: Re: No Anonymous Reply Optionby woolfy (Hermit)
|on Nov 25, 2003 at 00:03 UTC||Need Help??|
Well, that's what the request is about, isn't? Ignoring anonymous posts.
No, it was not about ignoring them, but about making it completely impossible to reply anonymously to a node.
The next step might be to make it completely impossible to be anonymous. Which I would not like.
I think this site is very tolerant, of which this thread is a good example: it is polite, substantial, humorous, informative. No insults.
As for anonymous monk teasing, well, I haven't seen much 'teasing'. Insults, yes. Teasing? Nope. Besides, only cowards tease anonymously.
No teasing? Oh?. Your threshold for considering something an insult might be a bit lower than mine. I think "coward" is a very big word, somewhat insulting. And regarding insults or demeaning stuff, let the innocent ones throw the first stone, brick, pebble, rock (lets not do a menhir).
And yes, some anonymous posts are brilliant, but some non-anonymous posts are as well. Being anonymous isn't necessary to post a brilliant article.
Too much fuss about anonimity. Really.