Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine

Re: Re: No Anonymous Reply Option

by woolfy (Hermit)
on Nov 25, 2003 at 08:42 UTC ( #309837=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: No Anonymous Reply Option
in thread No Anonymous Reply Option

No, that offers no explanation to me why this thread is intolerant. The first 4 anonymous replies (the ones I mentioned earlier) have a combined rep of 99 at the time of this writing. At the time of this writing, the other anonymous replies have a combined rep of 46. All 13 anonymous replies have a positive rep. Your 7 nodes have a combined rep of -17 (still, 2 of them have a positive rep).

There's a lively discussion here, lots of arguments, lots of appreciation for the arguments themselves, and even though many people disagree with you (and artist and zengargoyle and others), they still value the way you present your arguments.

In an intolerant website, there might be a flame-war, much more -- rep, or maybe the whole thread would be ignored. It isn't, obviously. These monks are civilized people, -- when the disagree, ++ when they agree (or disagree but appreciate efforts and arguments). And as far as I've seen, seldom with a grudge.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://309837]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-03-21 03:54 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (263 votes). Check out past polls.