Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Dec 30, 2003 at 09:48 UTC ( #317654=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to CGI::Simple slower than CGI?
in thread HTML forms

Very interesting: CGI::Simple states to be faster than CGI. So either this claim is not true or there is something else: perhaps CGI is preloaded by the server and CGI::Simple needs to be loaded again and again at the start of the script? If I have some time to spare during the next weekend, I might try some tests myself.

Update: I now only see that you are using the functional interface to CGI::Simple (i.e. CGI::Simple::Standard) and that the claims to be faster only relate to the OO-interface.


"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Comment on Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://317654]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (10)
As of 2015-11-25 07:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (672 votes), past polls