Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Dec 30, 2003 at 09:48 UTC ( #317654=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to CGI::Simple slower than CGI?
in thread HTML forms

Very interesting: CGI::Simple states to be faster than CGI. So either this claim is not true or there is something else: perhaps CGI is preloaded by the server and CGI::Simple needs to be loaded again and again at the start of the script? If I have some time to spare during the next weekend, I might try some tests myself.

Update: I now only see that you are using the functional interface to CGI::Simple (i.e. CGI::Simple::Standard) and that the claims to be faster only relate to the OO-interface.

CountZero

"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law


Comment on Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://317654]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (3)
As of 2014-09-23 05:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (210 votes), past polls