Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Dec 30, 2003 at 09:48 UTC ( #317654=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to CGI::Simple slower than CGI?
in thread HTML forms

Very interesting: CGI::Simple states to be faster than CGI. So either this claim is not true or there is something else: perhaps CGI is preloaded by the server and CGI::Simple needs to be loaded again and again at the start of the script? If I have some time to spare during the next weekend, I might try some tests myself.

Update: I now only see that you are using the functional interface to CGI::Simple (i.e. CGI::Simple::Standard) and that the claims to be faster only relate to the OO-interface.

CountZero

"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law


Comment on Re: CGI::Simple slower than CGI?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://317654]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-03 07:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (48 votes), past polls