Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Being Forced to Fork with Nested Regular Expressions

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Jan 02, 2004 at 17:41 UTC ( #318366=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Being Forced to Fork with Nested Regular Expressions

What puzzles me the most about the question is why you'd specifically want to use the regex engine for this problem. It doesn't seem like a really bad fit, but it's not a particularly good one either. I'd be more inclined to use some multilevel hash entanglement to attack this problem domain.

Makeshifts last the longest.


Comment on Re: Being Forced to Fork with Nested Regular Expressions
Re: Re: Being Forced to Fork with Nested Regular Expressions
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Jan 02, 2004 at 18:09 UTC

    I've certainly tried a multi-level hash structure, but I started to get too complicated. When you say "entanglement", though, it makes me think you are implying superpositions. I've never actually tried that route. Very interesting idea, though.

    Cheers,
    Ovid

    New address of my CGI Course.

      Actually that didn't even occur to me. I just meant multiple hashes forming a crossreference mesh. But if the Q::SP route seems viable, why not.. :)

      Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://318366]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-07-29 17:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (225 votes), past polls