Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re^4: = rather than =~ ? (too brief?)

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Jan 02, 2004 at 20:31 UTC ( #318409=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: = rather than =~ ? (too brief?)
in thread = rather than =~ ?

I think I understand what you/they mean, but the empirical evidence says different.

p:\test>perl -Mstrict -lwe"my $foo=1 if 'X' =~ /Y/; print 'Result is: +', $foo; " Use of uninitialized value in print at -e line 1. Result is: p:\test>perl -Mstrict -lwe"my $fob=1 if 'X' =~ /Y/; print 'Result is: +', $foo; " Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name at -e line 1. Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.

In both examples, $foo in the print statement has never been assigned a value.

In the first example, the compiler has seen the declaration and so only it's definedness is a problem and we get the "Use of uninitialized value" warning.

In the second case, it is not only undefined, it doesn't exists and so we get the "Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name" error.

It clearly indicates that although the if condition is false and the assignment is never performed, the my declaration has been see and acted upon.

This is true with 5.6.1 and 5.8.1. Maybe the documentation is out of date?


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
Hooray!


Comment on Re: Re^4: = rather than =~ ? (too brief?)
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://318409]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-07-23 16:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (146 votes), past polls