Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number

Re: Gov't view on encryption

by graff (Chancellor)
on Jan 23, 2004 at 02:04 UTC ( #323402=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Boycott O'Reilly
in thread Boycott O'Reilly

You said:

The government's attempt to control the dissemination of encryption techniques and algorithms illustrates my point best. If knowing the implementation of an encryption algorithm makes it less secure, then it was never secure in the first place.
I'm not an authority on this, but my impression about the reasoning behind the U.S. ban on "exporting" certain strong encryption methods was that these methods were considered "too strong". The perceived problem was not that America's own encrypted traffic might become compromised, but rather that the U.S. didn't want others using these methods, because then it would be harder for the U.S. to track what others were doing. I could be wrong about that, but it seemed plausible when I first heard the idea.

Comment on Re: Gov't view on encryption
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Gov't view on encryption
by stvn (Monsignor) on Jan 23, 2004 at 02:52 UTC

    Your absolutely right. Thank you for refreshing my memory.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://323402]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-11-28 23:48 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (746 votes), past polls