Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Why was it neccessary to pass a DBI handler by reference?

by mpeppler (Vicar)
on Jan 28, 2004 at 16:38 UTC ( #324703=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Why was it neccessary to pass a DBI handler by reference?

It almost feels as if the reference count got screwed up, and caused the handle not to get destroyed as it should (although I don't really see how that is possible). Did you try to run this with DBI->trace(3) to see what was going on?

Michael


Comment on Re: Why was it neccessary to pass a DBI handler by reference?
Re: Re: Why was it neccessary to pass a DBI handler by reference?
by kudra (Vicar) on Jan 28, 2004 at 16:51 UTC
    I did, but the results weren't very useful to me because 1) I have never looked at the output much before and don't know how to read it; and 2) the code is part of a project, and so the tracelog that was generated was 690 lines long.

    When the deadline is less pressing I hope to have time to product a test case that demonstrates the problem, but I know I won't be given time for it now that I've come up with a solution (the project is quite urgent). I'm just curious now! As I stated, it's not a real problem anymore, but I would like to know why. :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://324703]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (18)
As of 2015-07-02 13:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (40 votes), past polls