Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re: Re: How to lose Carp levels with @CARP_NOT?

by liz (Monsignor)
on Jan 29, 2004 at 16:52 UTC ( #324961=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: How to lose Carp levels with @CARP_NOT?
in thread How to lose Carp levels with @CARP_NOT?

The more robust solution is the new internal style. Just stick the line: $Carp::Internal{$_}++ for 'Log::Dispatch::Output', 'Log::Dispatch'; in your module. And now those two packages will be ignored whenever Carp crawls back, looking for where to start reporting the error from.

How will you know whether a supports this? Check if the %Carp::Internal hash exists already? Or is there some version number check that I can use?


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: How to lose Carp levels with @CARP_NOT?
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jan 29, 2004 at 19:13 UTC
    %Carp::Internal was introduced in Perl 5.8. $Carp::CarpLevel was available before that, but was always a bad idea. If you want, you can read a rant or two on why I dislike it.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://324961]
LanX what?
marto deletes himself from the all lists
QM deletes himself from all delete lists
LanX passes the blame to jdpatches. ..
Eily the verb from this sentence
[LanX]: jdporter adjusted the best nodes algorithm not long ago to public demands, my theory more complicated= more error prone

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (11)
As of 2018-03-20 10:14 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (249 votes). Check out past polls.