Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: using HTTP::Daemon instead of Apache

by shotgunefx (Parson)
on Feb 04, 2004 at 11:53 UTC ( #326472=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to using HTTP::Daemon instead of Apache

For general serving needs I would definitely stick with Apache.

I've got a few custom web servers that utilize HTTP::Daemon. I've been quite happy with the results. They deal with specific types of http requests and nothing else. Separating them from Apache gives me a lot of latitude as far as installation and configuration. Looking at my instances, they have a much smaller footprint than my Apache (which is on the lean side to begin with.) It's also trivial to install them elsewhere in case of emergencies (like the phone company cutting through a fiber and taking out most of the connectivity in Boston)


"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."
  • Comment on Re: using HTTP::Daemon instead of Apache

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://326472]
[Perl300]: Hi all
[Perl300]: I need suggestion for a module that'll help me to send email from my perl code. I want it secure and as simple as possible.
[Perl300]: I found from Super Search
[Perl300]: I found from Super Search, Net::SMTPS or Net::SMTP, MIME::Lite, Email as options
[1nickt]: Perl300 Try Email::Stuffer
[1nickt]: Or for a little more control, Email::Sender:: Simple
[Perl300]: any suggestion on which one might be secure and simplest. I am not doing anything complex, just check some conditions from DB tables and send email to myself (same domain) if conditions are met

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-10-17 15:51 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

    Results (233 votes). Check out past polls.