Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: Re: Small incremental releases are good!

by castaway (Parson)
on Feb 09, 2004 at 10:56 UTC ( #327600=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Small incremental releases are good!
in thread Small incremental releases are good!

Yup, I'll agree with that.. But there can be several levels of 'releases'.. For company stuff I would assume the 'small incremental releases' thing would mean 'upload/update into the central directory of stuff' (cvs, or whereever), so that any other product/dept that might need something fixed, can test/use/integrate it.

QA only (should get) gets it when its actually released for a customer, which they then test together with other actual product releases meant to be delivered to a customer.

At least, thats how the $company I work for does it. Eg the defect/feature/whatever is 'finished' from the developers point of view.

I'd say, you're both right.


  • Comment on Re: Re: Small incremental releases are good!

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://327600]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-05-20 10:28 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?