alarm works without active waiting,
Since the advent of SAFE_SIGNALS; alarm won't interrupt long running opcodes.
And the cpu requirement of the "active waiting" -- waking 1 per second: C:\test>perl -E"sleep 1 for 1..120; say join ' ', times"
0 0.015 0 0
0.015/120 = 0.0125% cpu usage; means that it would require 8000 of these actively waiting tasks to even register a blip on a cpu usage graph.
sleep 1 does not always sleep exactly one second.
On modern OSs, the differences are tiny -- essentially the time taken between the 1 second elapsing and the process getting its next time-slice: C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$t=time; sleep 1 for 1 .. 10*60; pr
+int (time()-$t) - 10*60"
601.386687040329
601.386687040329 - 600 / 600 = 0.002311145067215. A couple of milliseconds
Which means that after 10 minutes of waiting, those tiny differences will have accumulated such that you've ended up giving the user a whole extra second in which to respond. Big deal.
But the kicker is: alarm will suffer from the essentially the same delays and inaccuracies! Once the system timer times out and sets the flag in the kernel thread structure; it still won't run until it filters its way to the top of the schedulers list of run-eligible threads.
Re-reading the post to which you responded and the OP; the former is almost certainly not a solution to the latter -- but definitely not because of the reasons you cite. They are just sweating the small stuff whilst ignoring the bigger picture.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|