"Mini job"-ness and task forwarding are not really the right criteria for evaluating content suitability. We humans are a curious bunch. Voluntarily solve sudoku or crosswords. But then, complain when the solution is of actual use to somebody... There are monks in this monastery who gleefully accept any mini-challenge to cook up another obscure regex. And it's okay.
The right criteria are (dis)honesty and (ab)use. Often, the only missing piece is attribution to source, or, statement about intended application. These might be interesting and worthy problems still. So basically, the usual academic integrity rules.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|