Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
You'll hear a lot of bad stuff about XSLT from Perl programmers. There are two reasons for this:
a) They are perl programmers not XSLT "programmers". Believe some of the hype, not all of it. And believe some of the bad stuff, not all of it. I've created some very large projects using XSLT and AxKit, and while XSLT isn't the easiest thing in the world, it does have some nice features, such as being declarative (something almost no other perl templating solution achieves well) and being nicely standardised. There are some comments about non-portability of stylesheets between processors, but assuming you don't use "extensions" then this does not bear out in the real world - stylesheets port very well between platforms. In closing, my personal opinion is that TT is nice, but is much more of a programming language than XSLT is (despite XSLT offering functions and variables). XSLT is more likely to be understood by future "Design Geeks". In reply to Re: Model-View-Controller: Template Toolkit vs. XSLT
by Matts
|
|